what are the us standards for main battle tanks?

If the engine does falter, its powerpack can be removed and replaced in 30 minutes. The engine is highly reliable and the rest of the tank is ruggedly constructed, so it is unlikely to break down in conditions where other vehicles might fail. Actually, the computerized targeting system for the main gun simplifies the gunner’s role, and has an over 95% likelihood of hitting its target. It has also been suggested that the M1A2 could not be used without extensive training because it is so complex. The engine can also run on gasoline or diesel (like the Leopard)-you just need to change the fuel filter. That is only true because the Army elected to use the same fuel in both its tanks and its helicopters to simplify logistics.

You might not know this from following the debate about whether to send Abrams to Ukraine, because a number of half-truths about the vehicle made their way into public media.įor example, it was said that fueling the vehicle at the front would be difficult because its Honeywell gas-turbine engine runs on JP-8 jet fuel. The tanks don’t look all that different from the vehicles with which the Army began the new century-General Dynamics typically rebuilds the hull from tanks already in inventory-but internally they are thoroughly digitized, often with technology far superior to anything Russia has fielded.

What are the us standards for main battle tanks?